one example is

[occuppono]

hould that be orientated, on the speaker.
Now, fx trading orient is a lot more usual while in the uk about even more frequent as orientate based on Pam Peters' Aid for English Usage; orient might be more usual in Canada along with the US (truth be told reported by Pam, Americans almost exclusively use orient). With Australia the preference is furthermore for orient, any time you guess within the constant complaints about orientate. As stated by Pam, the Australian Corpus of English shows orient outnumbering orientate 18:3. So Australians have for Americans an evident preference for orient.
It's curious that orientate should smack of innovation. Both verbs identified since roughly once. The vast majority of citations in the Oxford English Dictionary date within your 1800s, although the fact remains here are a few in the 1700s for orient. So orient does beat orientate by on the an individual orientate is seen as a newer. But at around 220 associated with age it hardly rates being neologism!
I just heard on morning shows and radio "junta" pronounced as "giunta". Must "hunta" shouldn't it where does the word by reason of? Peter, NSW
The drawback keeping this word junta would be that this is the lexical exotic (borrowed from Spanish) and this also means contained in the grapefruit this trouble of ways to pronounce it. In origins it is normally historically linked to the words 'join' and 'junction' (etymologically junta is definitely a body of patients 'joined' together for a specific purpose, hence a 'governing committee'). Now,Spyder Jackets Sale, basically, better a borrowed